Physically
Centered
By Ray McClanahan, DPM
Dr.
McClanahan is a podiatrist
at the Northwest Foot and
Ankle Clinic. He is an avid athlete and is passionate
about the care of feet.
To
contact Dr. McClanhan call 503-243-2699 or footdr@nwfootankle.com
The
information contained herein is not intended to diagnose or treat ANY
medical condition. |
ARCH
SUPPORT
Since much of the current treatment for foot and ankle disorders is
centered on supporting the arch, we thought it would be helpful to discuss
what arch support really means and discuss whether it is necessary or
desired in the active foot.
In order
to understand the treatment of rendering an arch support, one must understand
the architectural principle of an arch, and liken that principle to
the multitude of arches that naturally occur in the human foot. When
you study the structure of the foot and the shapes of the bones of the
foot, you quickly realize that most of the weight bearing bones of the
foot, are indeed arches themselves by being shaped to have support ends
at either end of the bone and an open space or boney arch in between
the support ends of the bones. For the purposes of the current discussion,
we will concentrate on what might be considered one of the primary arches
of the foot, sometimes called the medial (inside of the foot) longitudinal
arch, the arch that spans between the rear foot or heel bone and the
forefoot or ball of the foot and toes.

Websters
dictionary defines an arch as "a curved structure that supports
the weight of material over an open space"
Said another
way, an arch is a structure that is able to support weight over an open
space, by providing support on either end of that open space.

Applying
this logical definition to the arches of the foot necessitates support
on either end of the arch, and is exactly the opposite of the type of
"arch support" that is available to consumers, either over
the counter (i.e. Dr. Schools or similar product), or from their
healthcare professional (foot bed, arch support, orthotic). These products
attempt to "support" the arch, not by supporting the ends
of the foot arch, but rather by lifting up under the open space of the
foot arch. This does not make sense.
True support
of the arches of the foot would suggest that the ends of the arches,
on either end of the foots open space are the structures to be
supported. This would mean that the heel and the forefoot joints (metatarsophalangeal
joints are interphalangeal joints) are the structures that should be
supported, and not the structures in between the ends of the arch.
As was
mentioned above, current commercially available "arch supports"
(which by the way are packaged under a number of names arch support,
foot bed, orthotic, etc.) push up under the open space of the foot arch
and not up under the ends. Many people feel a positive influence on
their posture and walking comfort when wearing the current type of arch
support, but this is not because they have a problem foot, but rather,
because nearly all footwear that is available to todays consumer
expects the wearer to function well while walking on a ramp (the heel
is elevated higher than the forefoot) with their toes bunched together
(from tapering toe boxes) and the toes held above the supporting surface
by footwear industry standard toe spring, which is the elevation of
the ends of the toes above the ball of the foot (the metatarsophalangeal
joints).
But wait,
didnt we just confirm that in order for the arch of the foot to
be supported, we need to support the ends, and not the middle, or open
space? Indeed we did, and as you cans see from the description above,
current footwear available to consumers is improperly positioning the
support ends of the arch, by elevating the heel, which is one end of
the arch, and unnaturally pinching the toes and holding them above the
ball of the foot (metatarsophalangeal joints), which is the other end
of the foot arch.
True support
of the foot arch would then necessitate getting the heel bone (calcaneus)
flat on the ground to provide support for the rear foot support end,
as well as getting the toes flat on the ground as well, so that the
toes can help the ball of the foot to provide support for the other
end of the foot arch in the forefoot.
Individuals
who grow up barefoot, naturally have the support they need for both
ends of their foot arch, and this is likely part of the reason why their
foot arches function perfectly throughout their lifetimes, and their
feet do not break down, unlike 80% of Americans who by nature of their
habitual shoe wearing and compromised arches, will suffer some form
of foot problem at some point in their lives.
This is
not to suggest that we should all ditch our shoes and begin walking
around barefoot, but it does suggest that our shoes are made improperly
and are the cause of the arch problems and the associated deformities
that many Americans experience.
Although
there is scientific evidence that spending time barefoot is exactly
what our weak arches need, the reason why it would not be a good idea
for most Americans, is because much of our immediate environment is
not compatible with our thin, moist skin and weak arches. We live in
a world of cement and asphalt and multitudes of sharp materials, such
as glass, that can become imbedded into our skin, interestingly; the
skin of the feet becomes thickened and resistant with prolonged exposure
to hard objects such as gravel, cement and asphalt. Unfortunately, most
Americans will never experience this hypertrophying and strengthening
of the skin and arches of the foot, which is taken for granted in many
developing countries, where all out sprinting over sharp rocks causes
neither pain, nor injury.
What is
suggested and recommended is that we make shoes that meet the need for
protection of the skin of the feet, and that shoe manufactures do not
presuppose that the fashionable design features of heel elevation, tapering
to boxes, and toe spring, are without significant deforming consequences.
In conclusion,
the most likely reason for needing arch support, is because todays
footwear removes the structural integrity of the foot arch by altering
the support ends in favor of supporting the open end, which is no longer
an arch support, but an open space support.
Pushing
up in the open space of the foot has the significant long term consequence
of weakening of the muscles that span the open space of the arch, which
are called the intrinsic muscles of the foot, as well as the numerous
muscles in your lower leg which send tendons into their final insertions,
many of which are in the ends of the toes. |